Why Prime Minister Modi Skipped the G-7 Summit

  A Tale of Diplomacy, Disinformation, and National Dignity

In a world governed by optics, global summits like the G-7 have long served as symbols of influence, diplomacy, and geopolitical relevance. When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi decided not to attend the latest G-7 Summit hosted by Canada, the absence sparked a flurry of narratives, particularly from India’s opposition parties. Yet beneath the surface lies a complex web of diplomacy, historical injustice, strategic autonomy, and media-fueled misdirection. This article explores the deeper reasons behind India’s conscious decision to stay away, and how misinformation is being weaponized in the global and domestic political arena.

The Congress Party’s Manufactured Outrage

India’s principal opposition, the Indian National Congress (INC), quickly pounced on Modi’s absence from the G-7, labeling it a “diplomatic failure.” Ironically, this is the same Congress that signed a controversial Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Communist Party of China (CCP) in 2008, raising serious questions about its allegiance and geopolitical understanding.

The Congress narrative insinuated that India had been sidelined by the global powers and criticized the Modi government for allegedly allowing U.S. mediation in the India-Pakistan conflict. However, facts tell a different story. India’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) has publicly confirmed that it was Pakistan who first reached out via the military hotline, pleading for a ceasefire following India’s firm retaliatory strikes. The U.S. President at the time, Donald Trump, may have made public comments suggesting mediation, but such remarks are best understood as rhetorical diplomacy rather than actionable foreign policy.

G-7 Invitation Politics: Not as Simple as It Seems

A key point ignored in the outrage is that India is not a permanent member of the G-7, and its invitation as a guest nation depends on the discretion of the host country. Canada, this year’s host, did not extend a formal invitation to Prime Minister Modi. Reports suggest India may not have confirmed representation due to the strained diplomatic relations with Canada, and understandably so.

Even if a last-minute invitation had arrived, India was unlikely to participate due to unresolved tensions. The Canadian government’s inaction on anti-India elements and their safe harbouring of extremists are well-documented, raising serious concerns about the summit’s integrity and security.

Canada’s Tarnished Record: A History of Injustice

Canada has often portrayed itself as a liberal, human rights-loving nation, but its record tells a different story. One of the darkest stains in this context is the 1985 bombing of Air India Flight 182. The aircraft exploded mid-air over the Atlantic Ocean, killing all 329 people on board. The bombing, attributed to the Khalistani terrorist outfit Babbar Khalsa and the International Sikh Youth Federation, originated from Canadian soil.

Despite overwhelming evidence, the Canadian government failed to bring the culprits to justice. Many of those involved or sympathetic to the attackers allegedly had connections with elements within the Canadian political system. Even decades later, the lack of accountability sends a chilling message about Canada’s seriousness in combating terrorism.

Global Conspiracies and the Media's Role

Global geopolitics is not free from manipulation. Narratives are often sculpted not by facts, but by interests—economic, political, or ideological. Western nations have repeatedly used summits like the G-7 to signal power blocs and isolate rising nations like Indi when it suits them.

The mainstream media, both domestic and international, plays a vital role in shaping perceptions. In this case, segments of the Indian media quickly amplified the Congress party’s statements, portraying the G-7 absence as a snub rather than a strategic choice. This method of repeating falsehoods in cycles is a classic psychological operation: say a lie often enough, and it starts sounding like the truth.

Operation Sindoor and Security Prioritization

Another factor being conveniently ignored is India’s ongoing military readiness and heightened border tensions. Operation Sindoor, a large-scale strategic defense initiative, is still underway. A temporary ceasefire does not mean peace. In such a critical phase, it is unwise and perhaps even irresponsible for the head of state to attend a distant summit in a diplomatically hostile environment.

Given the security concerns, especially on Canadian soil, Modi’s absence becomes a matter of prudence, not petulance.

The Bigger Picture: A More Assertive India

India’s refusal to attend the G-7 summit should not be seen as retreat or exclusion—it is a bold signal of sovereign decision-making. The country is emerging as a global leader, willing to chart its own course, refusing to be co-opted into symbolic gestures that do not serve its national interests.

This is not a time for manufactured outrage or media manipulation. It is a time to celebrate India’s rising stature, its commitment to national security, and its refusal to be bullied—diplomatically or narratively—by old power structures and their cheerleaders.

Time to Rethink What Matters

The G-7 Summit may be an important global event, but participation must be based on mutual respect, trust, and strategic alignment. India’s decision to stay away was a mature, calculated move reflecting both geopolitical realities and moral clarity.

Rather than criticizing this choice, Indians should recognize it for what it is: a sovereign nation standing tall, putting national interest above symbolic appearances, and refusing to bend under pressure—domestic or foreign.